Glenn, Dialectics, 1940
Logic
The art of correct reasoning. Terms, propositions, syllogisms, and the laws of valid argument. The instrument that the other branches use.
Glenn, Dialectics
19 articlesIntroduction to Dialectics
What is Dialectics? Its definition as the science of correct thinking, its formal and material objects, its importance, and its three-part division.
The Idea
Chapter 1 The Idea Itself
Art. 1 Art. 2 Art. 3
Description and Definition of the Idea
What is an idea? Its description as the mind's grasp of an essence, its formation through abstraction, its constituents (Comprehension and Extension), and its formal definition.
Classification of the Idea
Ideas classified by five aspects: their origin (intuitive or derivative), perfection (clear, distinct, complete), comprehension (simple/compound, concrete/abstract), extension (singular, universal, particular, transcendental), and mutual relations.
The Universal Idea
The Universal idea examined in two aspects: as Reflex Universal (the five Predicables — Species, Genus, Specific Difference, Property, Accident), and as Direct Universal (the ten Categories or Predicamentals).
Chapter 2 The Idea Expressed
Art. 1 Art. 2
Definition and Classification of the Term
What is a term? Its definition as a sensible, arbitrary sign that manifests an idea, and its classification by exactness (univocal, equivocal, analogous), by Comprehension, and by Extension.
The Use of the Term
How a term is actually used in context: Supposition (the term taken in a definite sense — material or formal) and Appellation (the application of one term to the reality expressed in another).
Chapter 3 The Idea Explained
Art. 1 Art. 2
Definition
How ideas are explained by defining them: the types of definition (nominal, real essential, descriptive) and the four rules every valid definition must satisfy.
Logical Division
How ideas are explained by dividing them: the doctrine of Logical Division (its three elements — Principle, Totality, Dividing Members) and the four rules that govern a correct division.
The Judgment
Chapter 1 The Judgment Itself
Chapter 2 The Judgment Expressed
Art. 1 Art. 2 Art. 3
Definition of the Proposition
The proposition defined as a judgment expressed in terms, with its three elements (subject, predicate, copula), the reduction of propositions to logical form, and the properties of quantity and quality.
Classification of the Proposition
Propositions classified as simple (the A, E, I, O forms, and the two principles governing distribution of the predicate) and compound (modal, categorical, hypothetical, complex, and multiple), with worked examples of every type.
Relative Properties of Propositions
Propositions considered in relation to one another: Opposition (contradiction, contrariety, subcontrariety, subalternity) displayed in the Logical Square; Equipollence; and Conversion — all as means of immediate inference.
Reasoning
Chapter 2 Reasoning Expressed
Art. 1 Art. 2 Art. 3 Art. 4
The Syllogism and its Kinds
The syllogism defined as an argument of three propositions in which the third necessarily follows from the first two; its terms and premisses named; the distinction between correctness and truth; and the classification into categorical and hypothetical syllogisms.
Laws of the Syllogism
The eight laws of correctness for the categorical syllogism (four Laws of Terms, four Laws of Propositions), each explained and justified, plus the laws governing the three types of hypothetical syllogism, with extensive worked examples and practice syllogisms for the student to test.
Figures and Moods of the Syllogism
The four Figures of the syllogism, determined by the position of the middle term, with their special laws; and the Moods of the syllogism, the valid arrangements of A, E, I, O propositions, sifted down from sixty-four possibilities to nineteen valid moods distributed across the figures.
Imperfect Syllogisms
The shortened or lengthened forms of the syllogism — Enthymeme, Epichirema, Polysyllogism, Sorites, and Dilemma — each with its law of correctness and worked examples, plus a note on Argument from Analogy and Argument from Hypothesis.